The best places to hang out during The Great Escape

Brighton Pier

Brighton Pier (by ‘peonyandthistle’ via Flickr; photo used under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs license)

This Thursday, a good chunk of the music industry will be making their way to Brighton for the start of this year’s Great Escape. On the one hand, it’s a music convention with talks, seminars and networking. On the other hand, it’s a multi-venue festival jamboree with hundreds of bands from around the world playing to locals and industry folk.

This will be my fifth year of covering the festival (I’m part of the MusicOMH crew this year) and I’ve been to Brighton enough times now to suss out where the best places are in the city that don’t necessarily revolve around music. So, here is a list of places to eat, things to see and do and more for the newcomer.

Pavillion Gardens - If the weather is good (that’s a big if right there), sometimes the best thing to do is to sit down in the Pavilion Gardens and watch the world go by. The backdrop is pretty spectacular anyway, what with it being outside the Royal Pavilion and Museums, one of the city’s best landmarks. Don’t take it from me, take it from this random Trip Advisor comment:

Full credit to Brighton for the condition of this magnificent building. Whilst it is somewhat sobering to see how the rich wasted funds it is history and that it is the way it was. Worth every penny of admission. The detail of exhibits, furniture, decor and the terrific information system is first class.

See?

This is about fifteen minutes walk from the station – in fact, if you just went downhill towards the beach from the station (and took a left) the chances are you’ll find it easily.

Northern Lights - Every year that I do Great Escape, I end up here. The first year I went, when the conferencing was held at the huge Thistle hotel, this was fairly close by. It’s basically a Nordic pub but the food they do is authentically Scandinavian. And yes, they have a lot of Finlandia (this was of relevance to my Finnish fiancée the first year we went down). It’s quite well hidden on Little East Street, a stone’s throw away from the busy high street.

Brighton Flea Market - For those who like a lot of vintage things, you can’t go wrong with the Flea Market. A few years ago I managed to buy a really, cheap, knackered polyphonic keyboard from what seemed like a forgotten era for £1. It didn’t matter that it was rubbish. I still enjoyed playing this wonky instrument for at least a year. It’s finding stuff like that that makes going to the Lanes so enjoyable.

The beach - It seems bloody obvious but walking along the beach will uncover a variety of things to do. There are a few pubs and bars along the strip (including venues taking part in Great Escape such as Coalition and Digital), tourist shops to get Brighton rock or otherwise and some pretty good fish and chip shops. The only downside is that I’ve never been when it hasn’t been windy.

I hope that is of use to at least one person. Hope to see you down by the seaside?

Tagged , , , ,

Noah And The Whale @ Palace Theatre, London

Charlie Fink announces that the audience had witnessed the premiere of his film just before the interval in such a nonplussed way that you’d find it hard to believe that he was on a man feeling the nerves. It would be entirely understandable if he had come across in a more shy and withdrawn manner; for their first show in six months, Noah And The Whale could have chosen an easier route than playing in a 19th century theatre in the heart of London.

Read the rest of this review at MusicOMH.

Tagged ,

Yeah Yeah Yeahs say no to camera/smartphone recordings

Yeah Yeah Yeahs want fans to put away cameras

Yeah Yeah Yeahs want fans to put away cameras

The Yeah Yeah Yeahs recently took a stand against people watching their shows from a screen on their phone. When they played at Webster Hall in New York last week, they displayed the above sign as fans made their way into the venue. Pretty self-explanatory, really.

Credit to the Yeah Yeah Yeahs for actually taking a stand on this without coming across as preachy. It’s so easy for bands to pull this stunt in such a manner that it makes them look bad; they are clearly trying to look out not just for themselves but for the people who’ve paid good money to see them. I remember when I went to see Placebo in 2009 at Shepherd’s Bush Empire where there was a strict ban on cameras/phones because they didn’t want any new songs from Battle For The Sun to surface online in rubbish quality but I remember the wording on the notices being quite impersonal and harsh. (Incidentally, the band overturned this themselves halfway through their set for whatever reason).

I will admit though that I’ve become a little jaded by the practice. In particular, I’ve never really got it at major festivals that are being filmed properly. People who attend Glastonbury and Reading must know, deep down, that most of the sets by the main artists are going to be shown in professional quality via the BBC and will stay on YouTube for all of eternity afterwards, so why film it yourself? Another thing that baffles me is the idea that it would be good to film good footage on a tablet. Why? It just marks you out from the rest of the crowd, who will then give you that fierce look of disdain because of your show-off nature. I guess you can get away with that in big venues (When I went to see Muse at the O2 Arena last year I vaguely remember seeing someone in seats filming something on their iPad but there were so many shiny lights on stage that it was difficult to concentrate) but in pubs and bars, it’s all the more noticeable.

However, I think banning devices from gigs altogether would be a little extreme. Like many things, it depends on context. Last summer I read an excellent blog by All Songs Considered host Bob Boilen that debated whether or not you could use your phone in a courteous way during a performance that doesn’t hamper the enjoyment of others. He has his own view on how much smartphones affect the atmosphere of a venue:

The nature of a nightclub is that it’s filled with plenty of distractions: clinking glasses, cappuccino machines, friends having fun with friends, plenty of chatter and so on. I’m not saying we should never ban cell phones at public venues. It makes sense during an intimate seated show, a quiet tune or a formal setting, but not a nightclub.

I don’t mind the odd snap here and there, because ultimately it’s nice to have a memory of at least being there and there are several aspects of a photo that can take you back to that moment, and there it would be a shame if there were simply no evidence of a concert taking place from the audience’s perspective. Again, from Boilen’s blog:

I want to take pictures and I want to text and tweet and Instagram. I can do two things at once. I can snap a photo, shoot a minute-long video, send out a tweet or two and still thoroughly enjoy the night. I’m conscious of others around me, I turn the brightness on my phone as dim as it can go, and never shoot video longer than a minute. The idea of being at a club or a public event, standing around and not being able to silently share seems almost old fashioned to me. In fact, I’m frankly more bothered by constant chatter by inattentive, uninterested, disengaged attendees than by a fan sharing a pic or texting a friend. A photo or a short video is a great way to share the passion now and relive the show years later.

What’s more, some artists just aren’t that bothered. Back in 2006, when YouTube was starting to get ridiculously popular, Radiohead didn’t seem to mind that the early live versions of what would become the songs for In Rainbows were available on YouTube in low quality and, since then, Trent Reznor and Amanda Palmer are both artists that have tried their best to relax the strict camera policies in venues, recognising that their fans are keen to share their own footage with others online.

In short, this is a debate that will arguably run and run. Until we get Google Glasses. What might happen when everyone has a pair of Google Glasses? The ability to record all the concerts we go to and save them onto some external hard drive without disturbing anyone! Well, apart from that dude that you elbowed in the mosh pit, but he was totally asking for it since he was being a jerk to everyone else…

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Paying to contact celebrities on Facebook

Experimentation ahoy at Facebook! The social networking behemoth has started trialing a system where they can charge users up to £10.68 for contacting celebrities or people outside their own circle of friends. Prices for different people will vary but, for example, if you wanted to contact the BBC’s business journalist Robert Peston (who hasn’t got him on your ‘likes’ page, right?), you’d have to send 71p, which is the standard price bracket, to send him a message. Facebook themselves have made no assurances that this new feature will be rolled out to all users.

I’m trying hard to think of the positives from all of this. Maybe this would put a curb on online celebrity-stalking. I can only imagine the amount of private messages that some famous people must get from the same person constantly, desperate to know every last detail about their lives. Would that fan be so desperate knowing that asking several questions could mean that you’d be owing Facebook a hefty sum? The answer is yes, because there are other ways to contact celebrities that don’t involve Facebook. Essentially, Facebook are hoping this is successful on the basis that Facebook that the only means of communication in the world is their own service. Which, sadly for them, isn’t the case.

Or, if you wanted to look at it from a different angle, imagine that I was a celebrity (at this rate, the chances of that actually happening are decreasing at a rapid rate). What if I did have hundreds of people asking questions via my own fan page? That would mean having to read a tonne of emails – wouldn’t be surprised if they all revolved around the ‘OMG!!!134 I <3 U SO MUCH23!!!!! WHATS UR FAV COLOR?11!’ type of communication – and putting aside hours of my day to respond to them all as opposed to doing whatever it was that made me famous in the first place in this crazy analogy.

I’m sure that Facebook will one day crack the problem of how to make people pay for certain aspects of Facebook but they’ll need to do a lot better than this.

Tagged , ,

Detached from discussion

You won’t have failed to notice that a major news event happened on Monday with the passing of Margaret Thatcher, some would argue one of the most divisive prime ministers that has ever served the UK. Amidst all the usual remembering and eulogising, there was also an ugly tension that rose to the surface. It seemed that the only way that you could discuss her legacy was through fierce rhetoric and an unwillingness to listen to the opposing argument (ironically, a famous Thatcher-esque trait). I read several angry discussions that led to hyperbole on a nauseating scale. And that’s forgetting all the people who celebrated her passing either online or on the streets.

It was at this point that I decided to give up discussing politics in public.

I’ve had problems for the last couple of years about the way that political issues are discussed. Discussion shows on television like Question Time are nothing more than weekly installments of “let’s jeer at the politicians” and debates on the radio are too often pitted as ‘someone for versus someone against’, therefore refusing to acknowledge a grey area that clouds nearly every single political issue. If you look at online comment sections, every thread descends into a cesspit of abuse that doesn’t get anyone anywhere.

The countless opinion pieces, vox pops and comments that have emerged over the last couple of days has proved that the idea of sensible discourse has been thrown in a bin that has been rolled down a hill into a nearby lake, where it then travels to a waterfall and falls off the top, never to be seen again.

So, with that all in mind, why should I share my opinions in public about David Cameron’s government? Or Ed Milliband’s opposition? Or the issues? There just doesn’t seem to be a point. I don’t want to turn into a person that I despise – someone who gets too worked up over things. It goes against my own personality. I’ve seen this happen recently to people I like and respect very much. If politics is capable of turning some of my best friends into insufferable human beings, then what good came come of it? It’s starting to come down to doing what I think will make me happy in the long-term.

I’d like to think that, as long as I still have opinions (no matter how private I keep them), I’m still entitled to play a part in society, to take action against something that I see as ill-fated and – this is an important one – joke about it all. UK politics is all one big joke anyway, so we might as well be on it.

You guys keep on talking. I won’t join in until we’re back to a form of dialogue that isn’t steeped in hatred, that isn’t “I’m right and you’re wrong” and won’t do more harm than good. That day will come, I’m sure of it. In the meantime, I’m taking the coward’s way out, because right now that is the best option for me.

Tagged , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.