Posted in January 2010

Mock The Week post-Frankie Boyle

Mock The Week

So, some brief thoughts on last night’s Mock The Week, post-Frankie Boyle.

The first thing to notice is how much of a hole has been left by the Scottish comedian. It was always going to be interesting how they’d cope without him and in the end it turned out that the results were mixed. The main problem was that Boyle provided such a contrast to the other types of comedy being provided by the rest of the panellists that it automatically feels a bit blander without him. His cynical, pessimistic, outspoken, and sometimes non-PC style of comedy is something that seemed to really keep the others on their toes and gave them something to bounce off. In theory, you’d hope that his departure would be compensated if the line-up of guests were good enough.

Judging by last night, it already has its work cut out. It was a very mixed panel. You had the good (Mark Watson, who seemed to get more of a look in this time around), the bad (Patrick Kielty, who has never been funny), and the downright weird (Milton Jones, who was far too random for my liking but I understand that he’ll have his appeal). Indeed, the show was only really carried by two of the regulars – Dara O’Briain and Russell Howard. I laughed more at their jokes than any of the other people on the show.

If this is how the series is going to run for the next few weeks then it might prove to be really frustrating. If you have a comedy show where only half (or less) of the regular cast are providing the majority of the laughs then you start to have problems. Having said that, next week has Sarah Millican, John Bishop and Chris Addison joining the cast, so it might be better. Either way, last night feel decisively odd.

Tagged , , ,

Future Of News Meetup at London School of Economics

Meetup logo

Last night I went along to London for Adam Westbrook’s Future Of News Meetup at the London School Of Economics. There had already been one meetup in December of last year but this was the first ‘proper’meetup. I think there were about 45 other people there from a range of different backgrounds (journalists at all kinds of levels, multimedia people etc.). I was slightly nervous beforehand because I was going on my own and wasn’t really sure what to expect. It was what turned out to be a really exciting and progressive meetup, with two excellent guest speakers and I got to speak to a few people from different backgrounds, one of whom I had only just realised when I got home had actually been following me on Twitter for a while now. An epic facepalm right there.

The first speaker was Cynthia O’Murchu, deputy interactive editor of the Financial Times, who showed off some fantastic data visualisation tools that showed that you can take a story from a subject like economics and present it in a way that makes it easy for the reader to understand. She showed a basic and humorous presentation that explained the shrinking finances of some of the people involved in the recession (at least, that’s what I think it was, someone might have to correct me on this). She explained it as “goofy and silly, but it tells a story.” It’s essentially data visualisation that doesn’t look like data. I think most people in the room were won over by it.

The second speaker was Alex Wood from Not On The Wires, who was part of the highly ambitious and brilliantly innovative Berlin Project in November last year. He explained the story of the Berlin Project, dating way back to their first experiment in April with G20 Live, which was only set up a day before the protests itself. His attitude of “if we couldn’t do what we wanted to do, we did it” really stuck with me. He also announced that there will be a conference in March or April called Digital Storytelling ’10. It’s completely free and is timed quite nicely since it’ll be of use for some other stuff that I’m currently planning.

After that was a brief brainstorming exercise and then off to the pub where I spoke with a couple of people afterwards. Unfortunately, I had lost track of time completely and had to leave a bit suddenly. I just missed my bus home so I had to taxi it back. Oh woe.

But all in all, it was a fantastic evening. The one thing that left me feeling very optimistic about the future was the positive and progressive attitude of the group. From the outset, Adam banned all negativity, banning certain phrases and questions, and the group in general seems to be one that is keen on trying new things. We as journalists have to be the ones making the change, ultimately, and we are the ones that have to find a new way of telling people what is happening in the world. I hate to use the word ‘inspirational’because I think talent shows have absolutely destroyed the meaning of the word but you get the idea.

Tagged , , , , , ,

Revision3 offers Conan O’Brien a job

Revision3

For the unacquainted, Revision3 are an online TV company who make TV programmes and put them up on the internet. I could have explained that a bit better but my brain is in meltdown after some dissertation work today. Anyway, they’ve issued an open letter, offering Conan O’Brien a new job.

Mr. Conan “CoCo” O’Brien,

I’m taking this opportunity to officially offer you a brand-new show of your choosing here at Revision3.  Rest assured, you’ll be able to bring your set, band and even Andy (especially Andy) with you as you transition to our cutting-edge online TV network.  We have room for the Masturbating Bear, FedEx Pope and even Mini Jay Leno here on the internet.

Have you seen the internet lately?  It’s huge!

Read the rest of it here. The idea of Conan on Revision3 is a weird one, but a really good one. I don’t think it’ll happen though.

Tagged , , ,

The home straight

Dissertation

It’s dawned on me that this coming semester is my last as a university student. Blimey. It’s a miracle that I’ve managed to survived for as long as I have without going insane but what I do know, eh?

Anyway, the next two weeks will be spent finishing off my dissertation. I am currently at 4,500 words and need 3,500 more to complete it. It’s just a case of writing done all the ideas in my head into coherent sentences that are constructed in a way that flows well. It’s now gotten to the point where I’m not too fussed if I am right or wrong…I just want the thing to make sense. I’m going to show my girlfriend some of it before she goes off to Finland next week for a two-week holiday (which, incidentally, couldn’t have been better planned as, even though I adore her, I am free of distractions). Once it is handed in on the 4th February, I will be going to a pub in a state of relief. I don’t care what pub it is, just any pub will do that sells Peroni.

After that is all done and dusted, I have two things to work on. One is my work experience placement, which is going to be a demoralising experience just to find one, and then my final project. Even though my skills are more suited towards online journalism, I’m going to take a gamble and go for print. The way I think of it is that the print project will actually allow me to focus a lot more on what I’m trying to achieve with it – something that has been lacking in the previous two group online projects. I’ll have to re-acquaint myself with InDesign, but it’ll be worth it.

The other reason I’m skipping online is because I’m working on another project at the moment that is quite ambitious and may well take up a lot of my spare time in terms of organisation alone. I’m not willing to explain much at this point but all I’ll say is that we think it’s something that people will be interested in.

Before I go, if anyone is going to the Future Of News Meetup organised by the brilliant Adam Westbrook on Wednesday, feel free to say hi to me if you want to have a chat with a journalism student who couldn’t possibly predict the future of news. This should be an interesting evening and I’m really looking forward to chatting to new people, especially those are happen to be in a similar position to me.

Tagged , , , , ,

How the Conservatives plan to ‘save’the NHS

The NHS

The Tories have published their draft manifesto on health that they will implement if in power. You can read it for yourself here. All I’m going to say is that there are three things in this manifesto that are a little bit worrying and dubious:

  1. “We want to enable patients to rate hospitals and doctors according to the quality of their care” – This means that essentially they want to ignore all advice from professionals in the industry and hand over some of the power to the public who know nothing about these issues and are routinely mislead by the media.
  2. “We will reform the way drug companies are paid for NHS medicines so that any cost-effective treatment can be made available through the NHS, with drug providers paid according to the value of their new treatments”- Meaning that the party who want to eliminate quangos are going to – yes, you guessed it – set up more quangos.
  3. “You’re more likely to die of cancer in Britain than most other countries in Europe” – This statement is not just ignorant in the sense that it fails to consider a variety of factors that could affect the figures, but it is also an absolute lie, as this paper proves.

So, there you have it. In order to eradicate the misdirection and the ignorance of the last few years we’re about to elect a government that is built on…misdirection and ignorance. What’s more, the manifesto smacks of removing the cornerstone of our society – free healthcare. Nice one England!

Tagged , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.