Tagged with media

‘There are downsides to being pretty average’: Why no one notices me for being insignificant

After reading Samantha Brick’s article about how people are threatened by her good looks, it irked something in me. We haven’t heard from the other side of the argument – the average person in life who is nothing more than an insignificant spec in the world that we inhabit. This is his counter-column, which probably has the odd grammatical mistake or two but please kindly ignore them since he wrote this very late last night and, to be honest, it’s all a bit average really.*

On a recent train to Guildford, whilst cramped into a pathetically tiny space like sardines in a crushed tin box, I was delighted when a train guard came down the aisle to check my ticket.

“Can I see your railcard please? Ah, that’s great, thanks very much,” he said as he continued his way down a packed train.

You’re probably thinking ‘what a boring thing that is’. Whilst it was boring, it wasn’t anything out of the ordinary. At least, not for me.

Continue reading

Tagged , , ,

Do I need an iPad?

It’s a question that keeps popping up now and then and even more so at the moment. Apple are expecting to announce iPad 3 on Wednesday and it’s possible that they might also be revealing a lot more – namely the reduction of price for the previous model – and a possible mini-version of the popular tablet at a lower price to lure in customers that have been dissuaded by the expensive of the main model.

The rumours of an iPad Mini, which will not die, are interesting but you do wonder whether or not Apple really need to make one. This could be seen as a reaction to the Kindle Fire, which as far as I understand has been selling quite well in America, but iPad sales are so strong and consistent that I’m not quite sure they need to be this aggressive. I’ve never seen Apple as a brand that sells well because it is cost-effective for the consumer (with the possible exception of the iPod in its present format), I see it it as a brand that sells well because of the brand itself. You never know though, it could be the rumour mill going into overdrive. Again.

Apple is expected to have a very successful launch and will probably a ton of money from the sales of the all-new tablet. They aren’t the only ones either – ARM Holdings, designer of the chips that went in the iPad 2 and the iPhone, will also probably see some success on the stock exchange (incidentally they’ll also have a good year since their chips will go in new Android and Windows 8 appliances) as will others like Micron Technology that have some relation to Apple’s products.

But enough about who will make a lot of money, do I actually need to part with my hard-earned pounds and pence? I own a Dell laptop that has worked perfectly well for me in the few months that I have had it for. The iPad to me, whilst a really easy-to-use and functional product, would essentially be replicating anything that I can do on my laptop albeit in a much more slimline physical form.

Michael Hyatt wrote a blog piece last year when iPad 2 was launched and he managed to perfectly summarise who would benefit from buying one and who wouldn’t:

Media Consumer: These are users who mostly consume media. The iPad is a fantastic device for this kind of user. You can consume media of all types: movies, books, web surfing, etc. If this describes you, the iPad may be the perfect device.

Digital Contributor: These are users who are more than consumers. They also contribute and collaborate via the web. They read and respond to email, blogs, Twitter, and Facebook. The iPad is a decent device for this. The software keyboard is more clumsy than a physical one, and it doesn’t have all the features I have grown accustomed to. I especially miss my keyboard shortcuts and special typographic characters.

Content Creator: These are users who create content. In addition to consuming media and collaborating via the web, they also create content. This includes serious bloggers, book authors, graphic artists, videographers, etc. Yes, there are applications to do all these things. (Heck, you can do most of these things on your iPhone.) But, in my experience, it requires way more work.

Either way, I’ll still be keeping an eye on the internets on Wednesday evening, glued to the inevitable liveblog that The Guardian will set up. These things are always  exciting regardless of what you think of Apple or their products. I’ll see you on Twitter in a couple of days just like everyone else.

Tagged , , , ,

Viagogo fails to get an injunction over Dispatches

From This Is Money:

Channel 4’s Dispatches programme has defeated an attempt by ticket reselling website Viagogo to get a High Court injunction against broadcasting its investigation into how ticket reselling websites work.

The show exposes how customers are paying the price for hidden practices used by the ‘fan-to-fan ticket exchange’.

The current affairs programme went undercover and found that major promoters allocate hundreds or even thousands of tickets to be sold at well above the face value.

I am out tonight at a gig, ironically enough, but this sounds like essential viewing even if we suspected some of Dispatches’ findings a long time ago. If you’re in the house, it’s on at 9pm on Channel 4. There’s something else that I could say on the subject but I’ll wait and see what the documentary itself reveals before going into any detail.

Tagged , , , ,

Charlie Brooker: The Daily Mail deserves its voice

It’s hard to cheer when a newspaper closes. Even one you’re slightly scared of, like the Daily Mail.

Yet despite being a malevolent ink-and-paper succubus that will devour your firstborn – seriously, chuck a baby at a copy of the Mail, and watch as the paper roll its eyes back and swallows it whole – the Mail deserves its voice. At the Leveson inquiry, when seething Daily Mail orchestrator Paul Dacre was quizzed about Jan Moir’s notorious column on the death of Stephen Gateley, he acknowledged that she’d possibly gone too far, but added that he “would die in a ditch” to defend a columnist’s freedom of speech. Whatever you think of Dacre, that’s a brave and noble thing to say, although disappointingly he failed to indicate precisely when he was planning on doing it.

(That’s a joke, so please don’t be offended on his behalf, especially because it’s precisely the kind of robust commentary on death he’s dying in that ditch to defend.)

Charlie Brooker’s column this week is excellent.

Tagged , , ,

Paul Waugh is the UK’s most influential media tweeter but which publication is really influential on Twitter?

Paul Waugh of PoliticsHome is apparently the UK’s most influential media tweeter. This was the result of the second Portland NewsTweet Index, which is a study of over 300,000 tweets by UK journalists between October and December 2011. You can look at the PDF graphic that shows the top 50 in full but I thought it’d be interesting to see what publications were covered. Here’s a graph I quickly made showing the publications represented and how many journalists from each publication are featured.

Click on the graph for full size

Despite Waugh coming out on top, he’s the only journalist from PoliticsHome to be featured. The Guardian, as you’d might expect, top proceedings with eleven journalists (the only publication to break double figures) and the BBC, as you might expect, come second with seven. There’s much to read though in the rest of the chart. Sky News, who recently gave their journalists new rules for the social media platform, are only represented by three journalists. The Financial Times, possibly due to the growing attention on the economic markets, come third with six journalists.

So yes, we’ve not learnt a great deal, but it’s still interesting nonetheless.

Tagged , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.