Tagged with Television

Loose Women’s discussion on Appropriate Adult

For the last couple of Sundays I have been gripped by a drama called Appropriate Adult, a controversial drama that looks at the relationship between serial killer Fred West and appropriate adult Janet Leach (a guardian who is brought into police interviews if the person being interviewed is young or vulnerable in some way). It was a very sensible and sobering but well-handed piece of drama that made for some of the year’s most compelling television. Dominic West and Emily Watson were both terrific in their lead roles and BAFTA nominations would be richly deserved.

The debate, however, remains about whether or not such a drama should have been made. It’s popped up everywhere – in newspapers, on websites, in magazines etc. – but it’s still surprising to hear about it being discussed on trivial ITV1 daytime program Loose Women last Monday after the first part of Appropriate Adult aired. My girlfriend brought this to my attention last night since she remembered seeing a bit of it on her lunch break at work.

It was a sensible discussion to a certain degree but I’m very keen on three points that were brought up in the conversation (chaired by Carol Vorderman with serial drama actors Denise Welch, Lisa Maxwell and Sherrie Hewson) that I think are disputable.

It’s too soon

Sherrie Hewson thinks that anything 15-20 years after an event such as this is still too raw and Lisa Maxwell, who I thought spoke the most sense out of anyone, summed up the conflicting emotions that I’m sure many people had by saying “maybe it should be left in the past”.

I think the issue of making a piece of art too soon after an event like this is almost redundant. What’s important is that what is created is not crass but instead tasteful. The panel seemed to agree that it wasn’t gratuitous so if that’s the case then why say it’s still too recent? Besides, if they think that’s too recent then they’d be taken aback at the amount of films that have been in a post-9/11 world like United 93, which received enormous critical acclaim. Similarly, films in a post-Iraq War world such as The Hurt Locker, a tremendous piece of cinema that deservedly took Best Picture at the Oscars in 2010, would be frowned upon also. Well, according to their logic anyway.

A documentary is fine but not a drama

Sherrie Hewson brought this point up and this is perhaps one of the most puzzling. Why is it okay for a documentary to be made about Fred West but not a TV film?  Why is that out of the question? To the drama’s credit, the production team did four years worth of research in order to make sure that it was authentic. Dominic West has also stated in many interviews this year, including in the Radio Times, that the story of the serial killer is one that should be told and that the issues it raises are equally as important.

It’s important these stories are told. The sister of one of his victims wrote an article in The Guardian in the late 90s about him and she ended it by saying the worse thing is that people forget this case and don’t discuss it. And that was really my moral justification for doing the part. I think what that woman meant was – quite apart from the memory of the victims – that this stuff still goes on, on an enormous level. I mean child prostitution and child abduction. 10,000 people go missing in Britain every year, 3,000 are never seen again. Some of those must have been murdered. There are probably serial killers out there that we’ve never heard of. Fred West was around for 25 years doing his killing. It’s important to discuss these things, as long as one doesn’t do it in a way that glorifies them.

The families involved

Sherrie Hewson (again) continually stressed her worry about what the families of those involved must think of the drama and assumed that they were all horrified and disgusted. Some were – an anonymous e-mailer into the show was related to one of the victims and described it as a difficult watch whilst Janet’s son Paul and Gloucestershire Detective Superintendent John Bennett have criticised it for various reasons - but I’m sure this doesn’t necessarily apply to all of those involved. From my understanding Janet Leach was involved in the research in some way and it’s fair to say that it’s unlikely Appropriate Adult would have been made had she not been involved.

The brutal truth of the matter is this: many films and TV dramas based on real events will always be a difficult watch for those that were close to the main protagonists. They also wouldn’t have been made if it wasn’t for the consent of those around the main protagonists. An example would be the Ian Curtis biopic, Control, which was co-produced by Curtis’ wife Deborah and the late music mogul Tony Wilson, who brought Joy Division to the attention of a larger audience. It doesn’t always mean that everyone will like it – former band members Peter Hook and Stephen Morris had a few gripes with it – but it does ensure that a story can be told.

Ultimately, those who criticise ITV1 for showing a drama about Fred West seem to be too focused too much on forgetting the past. The past has to be acknowledged from time to time. It’s those events that we learn from in order to create a better society. Appropriate Adult has won lots of acclaim and has raised many issues that deserve to be raised and presents itself as the perfect balance of acknowledging history and moving on from it.

But hey, as Denise Welch said, whatever opinions you have about Appropriate Adult, the make up team did an excellent job. And that’s surely what really matters.

Tagged , , , ,

Exile

Exile

There is a lot of flak given to British drama sometimes. This is possibly due to comparisons with offerings from America – as one Guardian blog entry suggested, ‘They get The Wire, we get Casualty’. Sometimes though, something pops up that makes you think that shows that we can produce something truly brilliant if we wanted to. Exile is that ‘something’.

Exile starred John Simm as Tom, a disgraced London journalist, who moves back up north with his sister Nancy (Olivia Coleman) and his dad (Jim Broadbent) who suffers from Alzheimer’s. The return brings back unsavoury memories for Tom as he has a strained relationship with his father due to events that happened when he was younger and wants to find out why this was the case. Along the way, he uncovered more than he thought he ever could.

I can’t remember for the life of me who described it as a good mix of human drama and conspiracy thriller but that’s what it is. The story is utterly compelling, expertly written and there is never one time where you feel appalled at the implausibility of anything (which is a frustrating habit of British dramas at times). In summary, it all makes sense. There’s a lot to take in at times, yes, but it’s not utterly indecipherable for the viewer.

What’s more, the acting is fantastic. Jim Broadbent is excellent in most things so it’s a given that he is excellent in this too. John Simm, who I’ve never really had the time for in the past since I completely missed all the Life On Mars hype and don’t watch Doctor Who, is pretty stellar as is Olivia Coleman. It is refreshing to see Coleman in a non-comedic role after Peep Show, That Mitchell And Webb Look and Twenty Twelve and it solidifies how excellent an actress she is.

The soundtrack is brilliant, the cinematography is brilliant…I think everything about it was brilliant. It’s the kind of thing that HBO would beg for, it’s that good. I watched Case Sensitive on ITV1 after the second two parts of Exile and, whilst decent, just didn’t really match up to the standard that I had seen an hour earlier. I guess that’s the problem with British drama…there’s a lot of serviceable stuff out there but nothing that really ranks as a must-see. At least when there is something that good, it is immensely satisfying.

Tagged , , ,

Do TV viewers really think they can dictate subject matters?

Eastenders

The internet is a truly wonderful thing. It gives me a platform to write blog posts on pointless nothings and everythings. It allows me to talk with people in a way that is effortless. It also allows me to rant about anything I don’t like, if I wanted to. I have certainly done my fair share in the two years of this blog existing and, regardless of success, it makes me feel relieved that I have somewhere to vent frustrations. A lot of people also happen to do the same thing for the same reason yet I can’t help but feel that the recent furore over the EastEnders ‘baby swap’ plot suggests that are many people who really should start a blog just to rant.

In response to thousands of complaints following the airing of the New Year’s Day episode, the EastEnders team have now decided to come up a hasty ending to the story; stunting the growth, sweeping it under the carpet and then forgetting it ever happened in a hurry. The message that we’re seemingly sending out is one of ‘Let’s allow the writers to write all kinds of misery they want except for Subject A or Subject B and so on’.

Some shows do stick by their guns. Last year’s fantastic episode of Accused that showcased a fictional tale of bullying in the army in Afghanistan was given plenty of stick but the BBC stood by the show with an admirable bullish-ness.

“The BBC has the utmost respect for the British Army and it was not the intention of this drama to denigrate British Soldiers,” the response stated.

“Indeed, the writer Jimmy McGovern is quoted as saying, ‘This episode is a work of fiction and as a dramatist I was interested in exploring how soldiers have to be at a certain mindset to kill. It is not my intention to slur British soldiers, for whom I have the greatest respect. At the heart of the drama is my belief in the sanctity of life’.

We believe that Accused is to be understood by the audience as a piece of fiction rather than a piece of journalistic reportage. This has been clearly explained as such in our press and promotional activity.”

That sentence in bold is absolutely key. What EastEnders is doing is not uncovering something that has gone unnoticed by Huw Edwards and his fellow BBC News colleagues; it is a piece of made-up fantasy.

If we’re going to go down this route of viewers challenging plots then I fear for the courage and bravery of scriptwriting in general. Comedy has already been watered down considerably on the BBC following Sachsgate and there is every possible risk that drama could be also be a victim. We are still in the midst of a society where, due to the sheer nature of reality shows and viewer participation features on television, some people are so foolish to think that they actually control TV. Sorry to break it to you but…you just don’t. Instead of telling writers what they can and cannot write about, we should be judging the quality of their output.

I’m not saying that the ‘baby swap’ plotline isn’t messed up. It clearly is. Hell, it’s very easy to see why people would be so offended and in such an uproar over it. Yet people are also forgetting that this is such a farfetched storyline that it just isn’t at all believable. Soap opera stories are never entirely realistic in any sense of the word, albeit there are certainly some exceptions to this. Despite the ridiculousness of the tales of woe that EastEnders conjures up there is always some reason for it and some message that the writers want to convey.

If you don’t like a TV show you have the right to complain, but you could also, y’know, start a blog and just rant them as well/instead? Trust me, it works.

Tagged , , ,

This weekend I am not watching…

  • Ashes To Ashes
  • Doctor Who
  • Jonathan Creek
  • A Touch Of Frost

Yet everyone else is. I could feel completely shunned and isolated but I’ve been too busy watching more of The Wire and Total Wipeout to care.

Tagged , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.