It is time to talk about the EU referendum. I know, you are probably just as sick of this referendum as I am. You don’t need to read yet another moderately-informed think piece by some random person on the Internet. But this is an important choice for the country.
We are about a week away from the vote and, if recent polls from The Independent and YouGov are to go by, the Leave camp is looking like it’s gaining quite a bit of momentum. I can understand the appeal for voters; when the rhetoric that is spilling out from their leaflets includes phrases like “take back control,” as well as promising “UK laws will have ultimate authority” and continually implying that it’s the safer choice for you and your family. I get how, on the surface, that sounds enticing. I also understand how voting for a ‘Brexit’ would be sticking two fingers up to the status quo, which would give some people much pleasure.
However, I am voting remain. I am doing so for quite a few reasons – chiefly that I think our economy is stronger when we’re in the EU, I think we are much safer as a country within the EU, and there are many EU laws and grants which have helped to make our society a great one; from working rights to grants that go towards local community projects, and even emergency funds like the £21m the EU gave towards the redevelopment of Manchester city centre after the 1996 bombing vs £450k from the UK government.
But this blog post isn’t really about any of that, partly because it’s been covered elsewhere in more detail, but also because that’s not my main incentive for voting to remain in the EU. So I’d like to provide a little bit of context.
I feel that the Leave campaign has issued a numerous amount of misleading statements (here are four examples), and their electioneering has used an approach that one could only really describe as scaremongering, which really doesn’t sit well with me. For simplicity’s sake, I’m going to pick just one example.
On Question Time last week (9th June), Nigel Farage said 508 million people have the opportunity to migrate to the UK from the EU if they wanted to. Full Fact points out that the actual number, due to rules on free movement only applying to citizens of the European Economic Area and Switzerland, is more like 440 million people. He’s out by 68 million. That’s not just wrong. That’s wrong on a scale the size of France with Lithuania thrown in for good measure.
He also said that we have no control as to who enters the country. This is true, except for the bit in European law that states that we can turn away EU nationals if their actions are a “genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society.” We can even turn people away later on if they are no longer able to support themselves financially.
But apart from all of that, obviously no control.
That leads us nicely to the issue of what happens to EU nationals if the UK were to leave the EU. The deathly silence on this topic has been frightening. At the moment, EU nationals can come to the UK without needing a visa (with limited exceptions), providing that they can prove their identity.
The only hint of what might happen has been through a comment that Dominic Raab, a Justice under-secretary and Minister for Human Rights, said on Sunday Politics on the BBC in April:
“I think we’d have to look at that as part of the negotiations in detail. But look, at the moment president Barack Obama’s administration … is looking at new visa requirements and screening from Germany, Belgium, Greece, France, because of the recent terrorist attacks.
“I think we should at least have the power and the control to do that and make sure we keep Britain safe,” the minister told BBC1’s Sunday Politics show.
Pressed if this would mean British citizens would need visas to go to France or Germany, Raab said: “Or some other kind of check.”
It’s a very vague proposition, and the fact that it hasn’t seemingly been expanded upon is horrifying. EU nationals currently living here do not know what’s going to happen to them. The failure of any leading politician to clearly state the consequences that EU nationals face if the UK left the EU is bordering on contempt. I suspect that, because EU nationals can’t even vote in this referendum, campaigners simply don’t care about these people: the people whose lives will be affected the most are not the top priority for Johnson, Gove, Grayling, Duncan Smith, Farage, etc.
There are a lot of EU residents who already live in the UK and make a living in this country, who, let me remind you again, can’t even vote. They are people who work as hard as the rest of us and pay taxes like the rest of us, and yet they are utterly voiceless in this major decision that will potentially alter their future in a big way. They are the dictionary definition of “taxation without representation”. Think about that for a second – how the hell did we get to a point where we’re having a vote about the subject of remaining in or leaving the EU, yet the people who will be directly affected have no say whatsoever?
Around three million people will be watching the results unfold on the evening of the 23rd June, knowing that they have no say in what happens.
One of those people will be my wife.
My wife moved here from Finland in September 2006 to work as an au pair. After that time, she has continued to work in various different jobs (even when studying for a BSc Honours degree in Psychology) and has lived here long enough to contribute to society in an incredibly meaningful and substantial way through taxes.
If we vote to leave, what happens to her? Will she have to get some sort of visa? Will she be forced to become a UK national, which she has said repeatedly that she doesn’t want to do? Will she be forced to leave? These questions have been hanging in the air since the referendum was announced in February and we still don’t have any concrete answers. If we vote to leave, a big question mark will loom over her right to reside in the UK. What’s even worse is that we may have at least two years of uncertainty as a deal is negotiated between the UK and the EU.
Imagine that: two years of not knowing what kind of long-term future you might be entitled to in a country that you’ve called home for nearly ten years. What would you feel? Afraid? Anxious? Angry? Maybe all three? Considering how much the Leave campaign keeps banging the drum about the safety of families across the country, all that they have done is made both of us afraid of what future family life might be like if we were out of the EU.
It’s not just my wife who is in this boat. I have had the pleasure of getting to know lots of friends and friends of friends over the past few years who moved to the UK from elsewhere in the EU to work in various sectors – healthcare, local councils, bar staff, accountants, childcare workers…the list goes on and on. These people came to the UK because they wanted to make a good life for themselves here. They’ve been told, effectively, that they are a threat to the UK’s future. This is deeply unfair and hurtful.
I read the other day that there are a third of voters who will undecided on how to vote until a week before the big day, so I’d like to take this opportunity to say two things to those votes.
1) At the very least turn up and vote.
2) Have a really good think about the people whose lives are going to be affected by your vote, because if you vote to leave then the consequences affect quite a lot more of your family, friends, and colleagues than you originally thought.
Thank you for reading.
Footnote 1: If you enjoyed reading this, although I’m sure that ‘enjoyed’ may not be the appropriate word, please share with your family, friends and work colleagues.
Footnote 2: Whatever way you vote on Thursday 23rd June, I would encourage you to read up on some of the fantastic articles that Full Fact have been posting about the EU – unbiased and completely based in fact. It was also a tremendous help when researching for this post.
Footnote 3: Thank you to Liam and my wife for reading this and proofing this before I posted this.
Footnote 4: Obviously, these are my views alone and do not represent the views of my employers past and present.